A Beginner’s Guide to Choosing the Right App Architecture: Reviews, Usages, and Best Practices

 

1. Most Popular and Widely Used Architectures

These architectures are popular because they provide a balanced approach to structuring apps, making them suitable for a wide range of projects.

MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel)

  • Usage: Very popular in both Android and Flutter communities.
  • Best For: Medium to large apps with a lot of UI components.
  • Review: MVVM is praised for its clear separation of concerns, making code more modular and testable. ViewModels help manage UI-related data efficiently.
  • Pros: Easy testing, modular, maintains a clean separation of UI and logic.
  • Cons: Requires more setup, can feel heavy for simpler apps.

BLoC (Business Logic Component)

  • Usage: Common in Flutter apps, especially those with reactive, event-driven UIs.
  • Best For: Flutter apps with complex user interactions and real-time data updates.
  • Review: Many developers find BLoC ideal for handling complex, state-based applications. However, it can be challenging for beginners due to its use of streams.
  • Pros: Forces a clean separation of UI and business logic, highly scalable.
  • Cons: Steeper learning curve due to streams.

Provider (with ChangeNotifier)

  • Usage: One of the most popular state management solutions in Flutter.
  • Best For: Small to medium apps or beginner projects.
  • Review: Provider is often praised for being simple and beginner-friendly. It’s also supported by Google, making it a reliable choice.
  • Pros: Minimal boilerplate, easy to set up, good documentation.
  • Cons: Limited scalability for very complex apps.

2. Architectures for High Scalability and Enterprise-Level Applications

These architectures are ideal for large projects with multiple developers and are designed for highly maintainable code.

Clean Architecture

  • Usage: Commonly used in enterprise applications and apps with complex requirements.
  • Best For: Large, multi-layered projects with a need for a clear separation of concerns.
  • Review: Clean Architecture is often described as an excellent choice for apps that need high maintainability. However, it can feel complex for smaller projects.
  • Pros: Very modular, high scalability, easy to test.
  • Cons: More complex, requires significant boilerplate and setup.

Hexagonal Architecture (Ports and Adapters)

  • Usage: Often used in complex backend applications but adaptable for mobile.
  • Best For: Apps that need to integrate with multiple data sources or APIs.
  • Review: Developers appreciate Hexagonal Architecture for its flexibility in handling external dependencies. However, it requires strong knowledge of architectural principles.
  • Pros: Flexible, high testability.
  • Cons: Complex, requires a deep understanding of dependency inversion.

3. Architectures for Rapid Development and Prototyping

These architectures are lightweight, allowing for quick development cycles but may lack scalability for larger apps.

GetX

  • Usage: Popular in Flutter for quick projects or smaller apps.
  • Best For: Prototyping, small to medium apps with simple state management needs.
  • Review: GetX is widely praised for its simplicity and minimal boilerplate. However, developers warn that it can lead to less structured code in large apps.
  • Pros: Fast and easy to use, minimal boilerplate, integrated routing and dependency management.
  • Cons: Limited structure, can lead to spaghetti code if not carefully managed.

MVC (Model-View-Controller)

  • Usage: One of the oldest patterns, still used in basic or simple mobile apps.
  • Best For: Small projects or prototypes.
  • Review: MVC is considered easy to understand but is generally avoided for large-scale applications due to tight coupling between the layers.
  • Pros: Simple and straightforward.
  • Cons: Poor separation of concerns, harder to maintain as apps grow.

4. Architectures with Strong Focus on Data and State Management

These architectures revolve around managing state and data efficiently, often used in apps that need frequent updates or real-time interactions.

Redux (and Flux)

  • Usage: Widely used in web applications, sometimes used in Flutter.
  • Best For: Apps with complex state interactions, like e-commerce or social media.
  • Review: Redux is praised for its predictability in managing state but is criticized for being verbose and having a steep learning curve.
  • Pros: Centralized state, predictable state management.
  • Cons: Boilerplate-heavy, steep learning curve.

Event-Driven Architecture

  • Usage: Used in applications that need real-time responsiveness, such as chat apps.
  • Best For: Apps with high interactivity or complex event flows.
  • Review: Developers like the flexibility of event-driven architectures but caution that too many events can make debugging difficult.
  • Pros: Highly responsive and scalable.
  • Cons: Can become complex and hard to debug with too many events.

5. Modern Best Practices and Supporting Patterns

These are not standalone architectures but are frequently used within various architectures to improve maintainability and structure.

Repository Pattern

  • Usage: Commonly used in combination with MVVM, BLoC, and Clean Architecture.
  • Best For: Apps with multiple data sources, making it easier to manage data operations.
  • Review: Many developers find the Repository Pattern essential for separating data access logic, especially in large applications.
  • Pros: Centralizes data handling, increases modularity.
  • Cons: Requires setup, can feel unnecessary in small apps.

Singleton Pattern

  • Usage: Common for handling global states, like a single database connection or API service.
  • Best For: Small, reusable components that are shared across the app.
  • Review: Singleton is loved for its simplicity but should be used sparingly to avoid excessive global state.
  • Pros: Easy to set up, efficient for single instances.
  • Cons: Can lead to tightly coupled code if overused.

6. Emerging and Niche Architectures

These architectures are less commonly used but are valuable in specific scenarios or for developers looking to try new approaches.

Hexagonal Architecture (Ports and Adapters)

  • Usage: Primarily used in backend systems but has niche use cases in mobile.
  • Best For: Complex applications with multiple data integration points.
  • Review: Hexagonal Architecture has a loyal following among developers who need flexibility and robustness.
  • Pros: Highly modular, adaptable to complex setups.
  • Cons: Requires advanced understanding, can be overkill for many apps.

CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)

  • Usage: Rarely used in mobile, more common in complex backend systems.
  • Best For: Apps with distinct read and write operations, needing high performance.
  • Review: CQRS is powerful but complex, mostly suited to high-performance systems rather than typical mobile apps.
  • Pros: Optimized for performance.
  • Cons: Complexity, not beginner-friendly.



This classification should give you a more practical sense of each architecture's suitability based on project needs, complexity, and your comfort level. As a beginner, it's often best to start with simpler architectures (like MVC or Provider) and gradually explore more complex ones (like MVVM, BLoC, and Clean Architecture) as you gain experience and encounter larger, more demanding projects.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Flutter Developer Journey: Where Do You Stand?

Learning Flutter App development in VS Code

Problems